• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Call For A Free Consultation651-686-8800
  • Firm Overview
    • Articles
    • Settlements & Verdicts
    • Video Center
  • Attorneys
    • Jeffrey S. Sheridan
    • DeAnne L. Dulas
    • Andrew T. Hunstad
    • Randall A. Kins
  • Practice Areas
    • Criminal Defense
    • Aggressive DWI Defense
    • Aviation Lawyers
    • Family Law
    • Estate Planning & Litigation
    • LGBT Rights and Family Issues
    • Business Law And Litigation
      • Real Estate Law
      • Small Business Law
    • Federal Workers’ Compensation
    • Other Areas Of Law
  • Blog
  • Contact

Dayton Doesn’t Sign Custody Bill, Tabling Discussion for Next Year

May 30, 2012 by Sheridan & Dulas, P.A.

Last week, Governor Mark Dayton issued a pocket veto of the child custody legislation that would have increased the child custody presumption to 35 percent.

According to Dayton, there was “too much uncertainty” regarding whether the change in child custody and visitation would be good for children. He has asked legislators to renew the discussion during the 2013 legislative session.

As we have discussed in previous blog posts, the goal of the bill was to provide noncustodial parents (parents who do not live with their children for the majority of the time) greater visitation and custody rights. Currently, state law presumes that each parent is entitled to at least 25 percent of the year with their children. This tends to mean that noncustodial parents spend every other weekend and time during the summer with their children.

In the child’s best interests?

The bills drafters wanted to increase that time to an almost equal share, but the share was reduced to 35 percent by the Minnesota legislature. While the bill passed both House and Senate, Dayton said there is still more to do to determine what is truly in the best interests of Minnesota’s children. Does increasing the presumption by 10 percent benefit the children or just their parents? Is it wise to take the decision-making ability away from the courts, who are supposed to consider a child’s best interests when determining child custody?

Here are some of the main points of Dayton’s letter regarding the pocket veto:

“Every marriage is different; therefore, each divorce has its own unique set of facts, conditions and circumstances. Thus, it is very difficult to codify one set of presumptions and preferences, which will apply to every family situation…

“The proponents of H.F. 322 [the bill] cite many cases where the law’s changes would benefit both parents and their children. On the other hand, opponents cite many compelling reasons why, in other instances, the changes made by the legislation would have harmful consequences for at least one of the parents and the children…

“People and parties on both sides of the legislation share the same, good faith intentions, rooted in their shared desire to proscribe what will be best for every parent and, especially, every child ensnared in the painful dissolution of a marriage…

“There is enough uncertainty about all of the ramifications of this legislation to persuade me to give pause to its enactment.”

We will likely see a similar version of this bill reappear in next year’s legislative session.

Source: Star Tribune, “Dayton issues pocket veto of child custody bill,” Jennifer Brooks, May 24, 2012.

Categories: Child Custody Tags: Child Custody, Divorce, Family law bills

Primary Sidebar

Practice Areas

  • Criminal Defense
  • Aggressive DWI Defense
  • Family Law
  • Estate Planning & Litigation
  • LGBT Rights and Family Issues
  • Aviation Law
  • Federal Workers’ Compensation
  • Business Law And Litigation
    • Small Business Law
    • Real Estate Law
  • Other Areas Of Law

Contact the Firm

    Footer

    Schedule a Consultation

    Sheridan & Dulas, P.A. logo Sheridan & Dulas, P.A.

    1380 Corporate Center Curve #320
    Eagan, MN 55121

    Tel: 651-686-8800
    Driving Directions

    Hours

    Mon-Fri: 8:30 am – 5:00 pm

    Schedule a Consultation

    Practice Areas

    • Criminal Defense
    • Aggressive DWI Defense
    • Family Law
    • Estate Planning & Litigation
    • LGBT Rights and Family Issues
    • Aviation Law
    • Federal Workers’ Compensation
    • Business Law And Litigation
      • Small Business Law
      • Real Estate Law
    • Other Areas Of Law
    The information contained in this website is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice on any matter. The transmission and receipt of information contained on this website, in whole or in part, or communication with the Sheridan & Dulas, P.A. via the Internet or e-mail through this website does not constitute or create a lawyer-client relationship between this firm and any recipient. You should not send any confidential information in response to this webpage. Such responses will not create a lawyer-client relationship, and whatever you disclose will not be privileged or confidential unless this firm has agreed to act as your legal counsel and you have executed a written engagement agreement with Sheridan & Dulas, P.A.. | Copyright © 2021 | All rights reserved | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Sitemap