• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Call For A Free Consultation651-686-8800
  • Firm Overview
    • Articles
    • Settlements & Verdicts
    • Video Center
  • Attorneys
    • Jeffrey S. Sheridan
    • DeAnne L. Dulas
    • Andrew T. Hunstad
    • Randall A. Kins
  • Practice Areas
    • Criminal Defense
    • Aggressive DWI Defense
    • Aviation Lawyers
    • Family Law
    • Estate Planning & Litigation
    • LGBT Rights and Family Issues
    • Business Law And Litigation
      • Real Estate Law
      • Small Business Law
    • Federal Workers’ Compensation
    • Other Areas Of Law
  • Blog
  • Contact

Us Supreme Court Splits on Traffic Stop Issue

April 25, 2014 by Sheridan & Dulas, P.A.

The United States Supreme Court ruled on Tuesday that an anonymous tip may be sufficient in some cases to justify an investigatory stop. While the majority opinion did not go so far as to say that an anonymous tip standing alone, without any other information, is enough to justify a traffic stop to investigate a possible drunk driving offense, the court did not require much more. The case was decided by a sharply divided court. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote a scathing dissent in the 5-4 high court ruling.

The majority opinion notes that under federal constitutional principles, an anonymous tip concerning drunk driving standing alone seldom justifies a traffic stop. An anonymous caller had reported to 911 dispatchers that she had nearly been run off the road by a vehicle, and gave the dispatcher a description and location of the vehicle.

The majority reasoned that because the incident had allegedly occurred moments before the 911 call, the anonymous tipster had little time to make up a story. She described an alleged offense and provided the license number on the vehicle, according to the Supreme Court.

Law enforcement found the suspect vehicle and after observing the pickup for a period of time without seeing any swerving or other traffic violations officers made a traffic stop. The majority concluded that the stop was justified to investigate a possible impaired driving offense. During the stop, authorities found marijuana in the truck and the two people inside were arrested on drug charges.

What happens if a driver on the road has a grudge and reports alleged erratic driving of another vehicle based upon his or her chip on the shoulder?

Justice Scalia says in a dissenting opinion that the woman did not allege a possible ongoing drunk driving offense, but an isolated incident that could have involved a driver avoiding a pothole. Alternatively, he opines that an anonymous tipster could simply have a grudge. He hypothesizes that the pickup driver may have held “hostility to [the anonymous caller’s] ‘Make Love, Not War’ bumper sticker.”

Moreover, Justice Scalia notes that the officer followed the truck for five minutes and observed the driving conduct to be “irreproachable.” The dissenting opinion states that the high court ruling justifying the stop “serves up a freedom-destroying cocktail.”

Constitutional issues can involve complex analysis and the line between what is lawful and unlawful may be narrow. Criminal defense lawyers will still be able to challenge traffic stops under the high court ruling on a case-by case basis.

Source: United States Supreme Court, “Naverette v. California, No. 12-9490,” April 22, 2014

Categories: Drunk Driving Charges Tags: Drunk Driving Charges

Primary Sidebar

Practice Areas

  • Criminal Defense
  • Aggressive DWI Defense
  • Family Law
  • Estate Planning & Litigation
  • LGBT Rights and Family Issues
  • Aviation Law
  • Federal Workers’ Compensation
  • Business Law And Litigation
    • Small Business Law
    • Real Estate Law
  • Other Areas Of Law

Contact the Firm

    Footer

    Schedule a Consultation

    Sheridan & Dulas, P.A. logo Sheridan & Dulas, P.A.

    1380 Corporate Center Curve #320
    Eagan, MN 55121

    Tel: 651-686-8800
    Driving Directions

    Hours

    Mon-Fri: 8:30 am – 5:00 pm

    Schedule a Consultation

    Practice Areas

    • Criminal Defense
    • Aggressive DWI Defense
    • Family Law
    • Estate Planning & Litigation
    • LGBT Rights and Family Issues
    • Aviation Law
    • Federal Workers’ Compensation
    • Business Law And Litigation
      • Small Business Law
      • Real Estate Law
    • Other Areas Of Law
    The information contained in this website is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice on any matter. The transmission and receipt of information contained on this website, in whole or in part, or communication with the Sheridan & Dulas, P.A. via the Internet or e-mail through this website does not constitute or create a lawyer-client relationship between this firm and any recipient. You should not send any confidential information in response to this webpage. Such responses will not create a lawyer-client relationship, and whatever you disclose will not be privileged or confidential unless this firm has agreed to act as your legal counsel and you have executed a written engagement agreement with Sheridan & Dulas, P.A.. | Copyright © 2021 | All rights reserved | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Sitemap