• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Call For A Free Consultation651-686-8800
  • Firm Overview
    • Articles
    • Settlements & Verdicts
    • Video Center
  • Attorneys
    • Jeffrey S. Sheridan
    • DeAnne L. Dulas
    • Andrew T. Hunstad
    • Randall A. Kins
  • Practice Areas
    • Criminal Defense
    • Aggressive DWI Defense
    • Aviation Lawyers
    • Family Law
    • Estate Planning & Litigation
    • LGBT Rights and Family Issues
    • Business Law And Litigation
      • Real Estate Law
      • Small Business Law
    • Federal Workers’ Compensation
    • Other Areas Of Law
  • Blog
  • Contact

Police Deserve Blame for Constitutional Blunders

June 24, 2015 by Sheridan & Dulas, P.A.

The Constitution is a hard taskmaster. To protect everyone from intrusions by the police and other law enforcement personal, the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution prohibits “unreasonable searches and seizures.” The police, wishing to search a person or premises need to have a search warrant, which requires a showing of probable cause to a judge that a crime has been committed or will be committed.

There are exceptions to the warrant requirement, as courts have recognized that in some cases, it would be unreasonable to demand the police obtain a warrant. A case from New Mexico demonstrates how mistakes by the police can result in prosecutions being compromised.

A defendant was involved in a collision with a group of motorcyclist while he was intoxicated. One man died and his wife was severely injured. The defendant was found by Sheriff’s deputies shortly after the crash in his home. Deputies entered the home with guns drawn and found him lying in bed. They arrested him on DUI charges and a chemical test indicated he had a blood alcohol content of 0.14. He was convicted of vehicular homicide and other charges.

The deputies did not have a warrant and the court of appeals found the seizure of the man was violation of the warrant requirement of the Fourth Amendment.

The state argued that the “emergency assistance doctrine,” excused the lack of a warrant, which in Minnesota is called the “emergency-aid exception.” The court found this argument without merit, as the deputies had been told that the defendant had run from the accident scene, which suggests he was not in need of immediate assistance to protect his life.

The court noted the deputies had no specific information that indicated he had been injured, and they did not even know if he had been the driver. The truck he had been driving and the scene at his home further showed no signs of blood or significant, life threatening injury.

While those involved complained about the ruling, it is the police, not the courts that should be criticized for failing to follow well-established law on this issue. Prosecutor may appeal this decision or retry the man.

Source: kob.com, “State court ruling could let drunk driver who killed man in ’11 out of prison,” Stuart Dyson, KOB Eyewitness News 4, June 16, 2015

Categories: Felony DWI Tags: Criminal, Felony DUI

Primary Sidebar

Practice Areas

  • Criminal Defense
  • Aggressive DWI Defense
  • Family Law
  • Estate Planning & Litigation
  • LGBT Rights and Family Issues
  • Aviation Law
  • Federal Workers’ Compensation
  • Business Law And Litigation
    • Small Business Law
    • Real Estate Law
  • Other Areas Of Law

Contact the Firm

    Footer

    Schedule a Consultation

    Sheridan & Dulas, P.A. logo Sheridan & Dulas, P.A.

    1380 Corporate Center Curve #320
    Eagan, MN 55121

    Tel: 651-686-8800
    Driving Directions

    Hours

    Mon-Fri: 8:30 am – 5:00 pm

    Schedule a Consultation

    Practice Areas

    • Criminal Defense
    • Aggressive DWI Defense
    • Family Law
    • Estate Planning & Litigation
    • LGBT Rights and Family Issues
    • Aviation Law
    • Federal Workers’ Compensation
    • Business Law And Litigation
      • Small Business Law
      • Real Estate Law
    • Other Areas Of Law
    The information contained in this website is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice on any matter. The transmission and receipt of information contained on this website, in whole or in part, or communication with the Sheridan & Dulas, P.A. via the Internet or e-mail through this website does not constitute or create a lawyer-client relationship between this firm and any recipient. You should not send any confidential information in response to this webpage. Such responses will not create a lawyer-client relationship, and whatever you disclose will not be privileged or confidential unless this firm has agreed to act as your legal counsel and you have executed a written engagement agreement with Sheridan & Dulas, P.A.. | Copyright © 2021 | All rights reserved | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Sitemap