• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
Call For A Free Consultation651-686-8800
  • Firm Overview
    • Articles
    • Settlements & Verdicts
    • Video Center
  • Attorneys
    • Jeffrey S. Sheridan
    • DeAnne L. Dulas
    • Andrew T. Hunstad
    • Randall A. Kins
  • Practice Areas
    • Criminal Defense
    • Aggressive DWI Defense
    • Aviation Lawyers
    • Family Law
    • Estate Planning & Litigation
    • LGBT Rights and Family Issues
    • Business Law And Litigation
      • Real Estate Law
      • Small Business Law
    • Federal Workers’ Compensation
    • Other Areas Of Law
  • Blog
  • Contact

U.S. Supreme Court To Review Minnesota Breath Test Refusal Law

December 22, 2015 by Sheridan & Dulas, P.A.

In most states, including Minnesota, a driver who refuses a DWI breath test is subject to an administrative revocation of his or her driver’s license. These laws are based on the concept of implied consent; when a person accepts a driver’s license from the state they consent to provide a breath test when requested to do so by a police officer.

Minnesota takes the implied consent concept a step further, however. In Minnesota, when a person suspected of drunk driving refuses to take a breath, blood or urine test, they can be charged with a crime and face a prison sentence of three to seven years if convicted. Minnesota is one of only 13 states that has such a law. The question whether Minnesota’s test refusal law is constitutional will now be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.

The case arises out of the arrest of a Minnesota man who refused to take a breath test and was criminally charged under the test refusal statute. He argued that the test refusal law violated his Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures. The trial court judge agreed and dismissed the charges, but the Minnesota Supreme Court ruled the breath test was permissible as a warrantless search made incident to an arrest.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2013 that a search warrant is ordinarily required when police seek to take a blood, breath or urine test in a DWI case. The U.S. Supreme Court has now agreed to hear the Minnesota case, along with two cases from North Dakota involving a similar law.

Attorney Jeffrey S. Sheridan of the Sheridan & Dulas law firm represented the defendant before both Minnesota appellate courts and is one of the lawyers representing the Minnesota defendant in the U.S. Supreme Court.

Source: New York Times, “Supreme Court to Review Laws Criminalizing Refusal of Body Substance Tests,” Adam Liptak, Dec. 11, 2015

Categories: Family Law Tags: Divorce, Family Law

Primary Sidebar

Practice Areas

  • Criminal Defense
  • Aggressive DWI Defense
  • Family Law
  • Estate Planning & Litigation
  • LGBT Rights and Family Issues
  • Aviation Law
  • Federal Workers’ Compensation
  • Business Law And Litigation
    • Small Business Law
    • Real Estate Law
  • Other Areas Of Law

Contact the Firm

    Footer

    Schedule a Consultation

    Sheridan & Dulas, P.A. logo Sheridan & Dulas, P.A.

    1380 Corporate Center Curve #320
    Eagan, MN 55121

    Tel: 651-686-8800
    Driving Directions

    Hours

    Mon-Fri: 8:30 am – 5:00 pm

    Schedule a Consultation

    Practice Areas

    • Criminal Defense
    • Aggressive DWI Defense
    • Family Law
    • Estate Planning & Litigation
    • LGBT Rights and Family Issues
    • Aviation Law
    • Federal Workers’ Compensation
    • Business Law And Litigation
      • Small Business Law
      • Real Estate Law
    • Other Areas Of Law
    The information contained in this website is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal advice on any matter. The transmission and receipt of information contained on this website, in whole or in part, or communication with the Sheridan & Dulas, P.A. via the Internet or e-mail through this website does not constitute or create a lawyer-client relationship between this firm and any recipient. You should not send any confidential information in response to this webpage. Such responses will not create a lawyer-client relationship, and whatever you disclose will not be privileged or confidential unless this firm has agreed to act as your legal counsel and you have executed a written engagement agreement with Sheridan & Dulas, P.A.. | Copyright © 2021 | All rights reserved | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | Sitemap